At least its commented...
I'm going through some old java code ('96ish) that has collected some odd band-aids over the years. Most make me scratch my head. I just ran into one that was at least documented. As strange as it was, I guess at least I know what the devloper was thinking:
The data members of this class must be alphabetized so that connections can be processed by VisualAge for
Java, and some were renamed using rather peculiar names in order to allow the alphabetization of